Home

www.history-what-if.com 


Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries? Posted on: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 05:38:10 +0000 (UTC)

On Mar 3, 11:05=A0pm, jpesterfi...@centurytel.net wrote:
>
> What about a different submarine doctrine. Make attacking support
> vessels acceptable, study German tactics perhaps, and invest more in
> submarines.

That doctrine didn't work so well in the Atlantic. About the only
forces that suffered higher losses % in action than the U-Boat arm
were the Kamikazes and Soviet Penal Battalions.

Yes, more AKs, AKAs and APs and other such slow ships are hit,
but more Subs means something else can't be built.

**
mike
**
1031439. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031440. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031441. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031442. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031443. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031444. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031445. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031446. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031447. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031448. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031449. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031450. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031451. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031452. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031453. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031454. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031455. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031456. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031457. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?
1031458. Re: Defensible WWII Japanese boundaries?