Home

www.history-what-if.com 


Re: A most interesting POD Posted on: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 02:36:23 -0500

On 03/05/2010 03:41 AM, SolomonW wrote:
> This is without question one of the most interesting PODs I have read in
> quite awhile.

> It is a wargame based on the aftermath of a successful Israeli attack on
> Iran's nuclear facilities in Dec 2009.

This is an ASB premise to get to the aftermath. There is nothing to succeed
at as there is no more evidence of Iran's nuclear weapons program than there
was of Iraq's nuclear weapons program. There is nothing to succeed at.

That said, Iran has clearly stated if attacked by Israel Iran will consider
the US an accomplice. Fine with me if that is what the US wants. The only way
out of that co-conspirator status is to splash Israeli planes as they fly over
Iraq. A rational US would do that. No rational country, excluding Britain,
would make the actions of another country draw it into war.

--
How would it look if Iran backed down from Obama after Obamba
backed down from Israel?
-- The Iron Webmaster, 4240
http://www.giwersworld.org a1
Wed Mar 10 02:32:23 EST 2010
1031652. Re: A most interesting POD
1031653. Re: A most interesting POD
1031654. Re: A most interesting POD
1031655. Re: A most interesting POD
1031656. Re: A most interesting POD
1031657. Re: A most interesting POD
1031658. Re: A most interesting POD
1031659. Re: A most interesting POD
1031660. Re: A most interesting POD
1031661. Re: A most interesting POD
1031662. Re: A most interesting POD
1031663. Re: A most interesting POD
1031664. Re: A most interesting POD
1031665. Re: A most interesting POD
1031666. Re: A most interesting POD
1031667. Re: A most interesting POD
1031668. Re: A most interesting POD
1031669. Re: A most interesting POD
1031670. Re: A most interesting POD
1031671. Re: A most interesting POD