Home

www.history-what-if.com 


Re: Earliest chemical warfare Posted on: Wed, 8 Sep 2010 21:34:07 +1000

On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:28:45 -0700 (PDT), careysub@... wrote:

> If the allies had decided to use gas in WWII, employing bomber forces
> to drop it once air superiority was established, which would have
> enabled establishing instantly lethal concentrations over several
> square miles at a time, then views on the possible effectiveness of
> gas today would be different (but it would be remembered even less
> fondly).

Imagine the effect on the fire bombing of Tokyo if gas had been used by the
allies in the mix.
1038298. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038299. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038300. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038301. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038302. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038303. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038304. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038305. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038315. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038316. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038317. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038318. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038319. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038320. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038321. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038322. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038323. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038324. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038325. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038326. Re: Earliest chemical warfare