Home

www.history-what-if.com 


Re: Earliest biological warfare Posted on: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:51:14 -0700

On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 19:44:04 -0700 (PDT), Scott Eiler
wrote:

>On Sep 6, 9:36 pm, "Anthony Buckland"
> wrote:
>> Well, here, anyway, you don't need massive industry.
>>
>> So, what's the earliest example anyone can come
>> up with?
>
>Whoever first threw dead cats into a city under siege. I thought it
>was Cambyses, Pelusium, 525 BC. But according to Herodotus and
>Wikipedia (both not always the most accurate), the cats were alive.

Before or after impact?
1038334. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038335. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038336. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038337. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038338. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038339. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038340. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038341. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038342. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038343. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038344. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038345. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038346. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038347. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038348. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038349. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038350. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038351. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038352. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038353. Re: Earliest biological warfare