Home

www.history-what-if.com 


Re: Earliest biological warfare Posted on: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:30:55 +0200

The Horny Goat, 10:51, giovedì 9 settembre 2010:

> On Tue, 7 Sep 2010 19:44:04 -0700 (PDT), Scott Eiler
>>On Sep 6, 9:36 pm, "Anthony Buckland"
>>
>>> Well, here, anyway, you don't need massive industry.
>>>
>>> So, what's the earliest example anyone can come
>>> up with?
>>
>>Whoever first threw dead cats into a city under siege. I
>>thought it
>>was Cambyses, Pelusium, 525 BC. But according to Herodotus
>>and Wikipedia (both not always the most accurate), the cats
>>were alive.
>
> Before or after impact?


Cats always land on their paws.


--
o o
L
___
1038342. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038343. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038344. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038345. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038346. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038347. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038348. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038349. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038350. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038351. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038352. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038353. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038354. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038355. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038356. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038357. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038358. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038359. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038360. Re: Earliest biological warfare
1038361. Re: Earliest biological warfare