Home

www.history-what-if.com 


Re: Earliest chemical warfare Posted on: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:24:36 -0700

[Default] I missed the Staff meeting, but the Memos showed that Steve
Hix wrote on Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:41:26
-0700 in soc.history.what-if :
>In article ,
> pyotr filipivich wrote:
>
>> This is the "problem" in a nutshell. Something works well in
>> trials, or under certain conditions, but not always. Or not reliably.
>> I had a prof who in his youth, had attempted to make "Carmel"
>> rocket fuel. Basically a solid booster made of sugar and aluminum
>> powder.
>
>Uhhh. Where was the oxidizer?

I dunno, I'm relating a "war story". Tom had a tendency to leave
out manufacturing details, either for safety, or because "you either
know this or you don't". (Kids, don't try this at home. Try it at
someone else's house!)
Important thing is that the one time he gets the formula right, it
wasn't the right formula for what he wanted it to do.

> We used to use potassium perchlorate, carefully.
>Worked pretty well for smokes.
>
>> He'd never got it right, but he did produce some impressive
>> smoke bombs. When a friend asked him to make one for a prank at
>> college, he did. And this time, got it right. The entire coffee can
>> lit off and produced a massive flare, and burned out very quickly. Too
>> bad the can was "aimed" down, or who knows what kind of altitude he's
>> have reached.
--
pyotr Filipivich
"Bother," said Pooh, "Eeyore, ready two photon torpedoes and
lock phasers on the Heffalump. Piglet, meet me in transporter
room three. Christopher Robin, you have the bridge."
1038348. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038349. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038350. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038351. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038352. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038353. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038354. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038355. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038356. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038357. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038358. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038359. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038360. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038361. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038362. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038363. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038364. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038365. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038366. Re: Earliest chemical warfare
1038367. Re: Earliest chemical warfare