In article <1148228771.928698.188160@j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
ssharma wrote:
> What ever topic i started the way you explained, got less than 5-10
> replies.
>
Mostly because you don't seem to actually want to have a give and take
with people. If posters learn that nothing they say in one of your
threads will get you to think about a situation differently, they'll
stop bothering.
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/3e8438
> 9ea585cd42/c7e3af9ffe3604ef?lnk=st&q=&rnum=2#c7e3af9ffe3604ef
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/9cdb74
> b7ed9e161c/184dfe6d7403d13c?lnk=st&q=&rnum=38#184dfe6d7403d13c
>
>
> Whatever topic i started only with two or three sentences got response
> from 25-30 people.
>
But are those responses just people asking for more info? :)
--
Chris Mack "Refugee, total shit. That's how I've always seen us.
'Invid Fan' Not a help, you'll admit, to agreement between us."
-'Deal/No Deal', CHESS |
