ssharma wrote:
> What ever topic i started the way you explained, got less than 5-10
> replies.
To be blunt, the number of replies is irrelevant. Silence often means,
"Interesting, but I have nothing to add." While posters could actually
reply with that, if everyone did, it would drown out actual discussion.
> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/3e84389ea585cd42/c7e3af9ffe3604ef?lnk=st&q=&rnum=2#c7e3af9ffe3604ef
This doesn't have a single PoD, which is a usual convention on this NG.
You would have been better thought of had you posted a little more
information about the Guptas and given a deeper analysis of their
similarities to (and differences from) Rome.
>http://groups.google.com/group/soc.history.what-if/browse_thread/thread/9cdb74b7ed9e161c/184dfe6d7403d13c?lnk=st&q=&rnum=38#184dfe6d7403d13c
Here, you actually got a good reply, and basically ignored it. If
someone has gone to the trouble of trying to help you with your
scenario, the least you could do is take them seriously.
> Whatever topic i started only with two or three sentences got response
> from 25-30 people.
What's the content of these responses? From what I've seen, a lot of
them are bashing you. If all that matters to you is the number of
replies, then you really are a troll (regardless of your politics),
because you're wasting time - both your own and that of other posters.
- Derrick
|
