Home

www.history-what-if.com 


Re: The Vikings Posted on: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:20:52 BST


"allan connochie" wrote in message
news:447789ed@news.greennet.net...
>
> "manxman" wrote in message
> news:1148596816.555201.124420@i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > You have wipped me and abused me. Happy now???
>
> Where exactly have I abused you? In my first post to you I simply pointed
> out that you'd made a lot of mistakes in the section on the Celts and
> suggested that talking your website up like you did is a mistake when it's
> so full of mistakes. I then listed the various obvious mistakes I noticed.
> Rather than conceding you were wrong, or in fact coming back and trying to
> defend what you had claimed, you simply told me to go to school or go to
> university and get a degree before coming back to argue. I repeat one
> doesn't need a degree on the subject to have basic knowledge about one's
> country. I repeat if you put your work in the public domain then you have
> to prepared for people actually reading it and commenting on it,
especially
> when it's so fundamentally flawed. All I did was point out what were some
> basic mistakes and then comment on your negative reaction to criticism of
> your work. That is not abuse. If you believe that any of my points were in
> fact incorrect then rather than throwing the rattle out of the cot just
cite
> your evidence and debate.
>

He can't spell 'wipped' either.

Surreyman

934819. Re: The Vikings
934820. Re: The Vikings
934821. Re: The Vikings
934822. Re: The Vikings
934823. Re: The Vikings
934824. Re: The Vikings
934825. Re: The Vikings
934826. Re: The Vikings
934827. Re: The Vikings
934828. Re: The Vikings
934829. Re: The Vikings
934830. Re: The Vikings
934831. Re: The Vikings
934832. Re: The Vikings
934833. Re: The Vikings
934834. Re: The Vikings
934835. Re: The Vikings
934836. Re: The Vikings
934837. Re: The Vikings
934838. Re: The Vikings